robotstxt.unknown-directive
Non-standard robots.txt directives are read by some crawlers and ignored by others
Why it matters
Not a defect — Crawl-delay and Host are spelled correctly and some crawlers honour them. Worth knowing because Google does not, so a site relying on one for rate limiting is relying on nothing where it matters most.
What the finding looks like
The message goflag prints, with example values substituted.
How to fix it
The catalogue carries no snippet for a site rule: a cross-page rule builds its remedy from what the crawl found, so goflag attaches the fix to the finding itself rather than to the rule. Run it and read the finding.
Says who?
This rule is guideline, and it cites the documents below. Nothing here is goflag’s opinion of what a good page looks like — if you disagree with a finding, this is what you are disagreeing with.
- RFC 9309 — Robots Exclusion Protocol
IETF · normative
- Introduction to robots.txt
Google · vendor-spec